Experts You Won’t See On TV
Many independent scientists have been critical of the official figures & policies. Here are some testimonies & analyses from experts you won’t see on the nightly news.
- Beda M Stadler, former director of the Institute for Immunology at the University of Bern, a biologist and professor emeritus:
- Richard A. Epstein, Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution, Professor of Law at New York University Law School, and a senior lecturer at the University of Chicago:
- John Ioannidis, Professor of Medicine,Epidemiology, and Population Health, Stanford:
“Three months after the outbreak emerged, most countries, including the U.S., lack the ability to test a large number of people and no countries have reliable data on the prevalence of the virus…”
“This evidence fiasco creates tremendous uncertainty about the risk of dying from Covid-19. Reported case fatality rates, like the official 3.4% rate from the World Health Organization, cause horror — and are meaningless.”
- Karl Friston, neuroscientist at University College London:
“…when researchers tested blood samples taken years before the pandemic started, they found T cells which were specifically tailored to detect proteins on the surface of Covid-19. This suggests that some people already had a pre-existing degree of resistance against the virus before it ever infected a human. And it appears to be surprisingly prevalent: 40-60% of unexposed individuals had these cells.”
https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20200716-the-people-with-hidden-protection-from-covid-19
Please note that immunity derived from T cells won’t show up on antibody tests.
- D. G. Rancourt, Professor of Physics, University of Ottawa:
“The latest data of all-cause mortality by week does not show a winter-burden mortality that is statistically larger than for past winters. There was no plague. However, a sharp “COVID peak” is present in the data, for several jurisdictions in Europe and the USA. This all-cause-mortality “COVID peak” has unique characteristics… [which] lead me to postulate that the “COVID peak” results from an accelerated mass homicide of immune-vulnerable individuals”
His conclusion reinforces the nursing home fatality correlations we saw in part 2.
- Joel Hay, PhD Health Economist, USC:
“There is no scientific proof social distancing prevents the spread of covid-19”
- Stoian Alexov, President of the Bulgarian Pathology Association:
“Dr. Stoian Alexov called the World Health Organization (WHO) a ‘criminal medical organization’ for creating worldwide fear and chaos without providing objectively verifiable proof of a pandemic.”
“Another stunning revelation from… Dr. Alexov is that he believes it’s currently ‘impossible’ to create a vaccine against the virus. He also revealed that European pathologists haven’t identified any antibodies that are specific for SARS-CoV-2.”
“Therefore… pathologists cannot verify whether SARS-CoV-2 is present in the body, or whether the diseases and deaths attributed to it indeed were caused by the virus rather than by something else.”
“What all of the pathologists said is that there’s no one who has died from the coronavirus. I will repeat that: no one has died from the coronavirus.”
- Unfortunately I can’t read German so this is hard to truly verify, but supposedly an internal German government report was leaked by a whistleblower. It includes these gems and more:
“The people who die from Corona are essentially those who would statistically die this year, because they have reached the end of their lives and their weakened bodies can no longer cope with any random everyday stress (including the approximately 150 viruses currently in circulation).”
“The danger is obviously no greater than that of many other viruses. There is no evidence that this was more than a false alarm.”
- This is a 100-doctor zoom roundtable where they vote in real time on Covid-related questions. There is a list of clips on the page where you can see their responses to various questions.
The common thread of all these Doctoral analyses is the virus is not so unique or special as they’ve made it out to be. Most of us already have at least some immunity. Good thing we’ve terrified and panicked the public, thrashed our economy, and badly damaged or outright ended millions of lives (see parts 9 & 10).
Corruption at the CDC
In 2016, a group of CDC scientists wrote a letter complaining about corruption at the agency:
“We are a group of scientists at CDC that are very concerned about the current state of ethics at our agency. It appears that our mission is being influenced and shaped by outside parties and rogue interests.”
“Public health, government watchdog and public interest groups today petitioned the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to cease making false disclaimers that it ‘does not accept commercial support’ and has ‘no financial interests or other relationships with the manufacturers of commercial products.’”
https://www.citizen.org/news/groups-to-cdc-stop-falsely-claiming-not-to-accept-corporate-money/
“…a former senior federal health official nominated to his post by President Trump, alleges that the delays in testing occurred because leaders at the Centers for Disease Control ‘lied’ to the president, and to Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar, about the center’s ability to produce the kits.”
The CDC put out test kits that were contaminated with the virus, making the results worthless. They claim it’s not possible the test kits spread the virus to humans, but if a swab inserted into the very back of your throat at the base of your brain has viruses on it, it seems likely to infect you.
Remember when people were disinfecting their packages and groceries for fear they had the virus on them? What great guidance that was.
“[The CDC] …changed its guidelines from early March that simply said it ‘may be possible’ to spread the virus from contaminated surfaces. The CDC now includes ‘surfaces or objects’ under a section that details ways in which the coronavirus does not readily transmit.”
Everything about the CDC’s data collection & display methods appears to be outdated & incompetent:
“As the federal agency with primary responsibility for handling infectious diseases, the CDC uses an antiquated system to collect information essential to fighting the coronavirus. Medical workers literally phone or fax in their data. And when they do, it’s not the data we need.
The CDC employs thousands of experts and has been around for 76 years. Yet its COVID-19 data pales in comparison to what’s available on websites that didn’t even exist a few months ago. One of these, The Atlantic’s COVID Tracking Project, was launched in March – the same month Congress gave the CDC $1 billion to collect the same data.
Multiple congresses and administrations have tried to drag the CDC into the 21st century, to no avail. Since 2006, the CDC has ignored four separate laws requiring it to build a modern, efficient system for collecting information to combat disease. The Government Accountability Office has twice reprimanded the CDC for its impudence. A decade ago, it warned prophetically that “the nation will lack an effective tool for ensuring that public health situational awareness capabilities have been established.
Compounding the problem is the fact that CDC reporting is usually a one-way street: Health care workers report to public health officials, but get little information back. The result: clinical knowledge, patient data and best practices for treating COVID-19 aren’t being shared in real time for hospitals and policymakers to use. That is costing lives, as well as trillions of dollars.“
Even Dr. Birx is on record saying she fears the CDC’s tracking system was inflating statistics like mortality rates and case numbers by up to 25%. She went as far as to tell CDC Director Robert Refield “There is nothing from the CDC that I can trust.”
It’s no wonder Trump wants hospitals to send data directly to HHS instead of the CDC. I would too.
Event 201
In early November 2019, a simulation was run by Johns Hopkins, the World Economic Forum, and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation:
“Event 201 simulates an outbreak of a novel zoonotic coronavirus transmitted from bats to pigs to people that eventually becomes efficiently transmissible from person to person, leading to a severe pandemic. The pathogen and the disease it causes are modeled largely on SARS, but it is more transmissible in the community setting by people with mild symptoms.”
Official website, Youtube channel
So they simulated exactly what happened a couple months later. Which is by itself very, very suspicious, but the most damning thing about it is they analyzed public & private responses to the pandemic, made recommendations, and then our experts… DIDN’T PREPARE.
Why didn’t they stockpile masks, gloves, and other supplies immediately? Modernize the CDC data systems? Establish reporting & accounting standards nation-wide? Put quarantine & isolation policies on the books immediately so we could have effective responses nationwide and avoid what happened in New England? Come up with plans to shield the weak and vulnerable without needing to lock down most of the nation?