The Great Reset
The World Economic Forum is the 1% of the 1%. They’re excited about the opportunity to redesign the world given to them by the “pandemic.” Derrick Broze described The Great Reset well in an article for The Last American Vagabond:
“The predetermined path we are being led down is known as “The Great Reset” and was announced in early June by the World Economic Forum…
The launch of The Great Reset was supported by Klaus Schwab, the founder and executive chairman of the World Economic Forum; England’s Prince Charles; Antonio Guterres, Secretary-General of the UN; and Kristalina Georgieva of the International Monetary Fund. The kick-off was truly an international event with the participation of Ma Jun, the chairman of the Green Finance Committee at the China Society for Finance and Banking and a member of the Monetary Policy Committee of the People’s Bank of China. The event was also supported by Bernard Looney, CEO of BP; Ajay Banga, CEO of Mastercard; and Bradford Smith, president of Microsoft.“
Klaus Schwab has said:
“To achieve a better outcome, the world must act jointly and swiftly to revamp all aspects of our societies and economies, from education to social contracts and working conditions. Every country, from the United States to China, must participate, and every industry, from oil and gas to tech, must be transformed. In short, we need a ‘Great Reset’ of capitalism.”
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/06/now-is-the-time-for-a-great-reset/
Emphasis added. It appears many powerful people and organizations are interested in a top-down revamp of the world they’re calling “The Great Reset.” The WEF’s plan is freely available on their website (updated frequently), I invite everyone to take a look at how they’re going to incorporate Covid-19, “ethics and identity,” “business disruption,” “disruption to jobs and skills,” drones, vaccination, and “global governance” into their revamp of society.
A revamp dictated to the people by the elite. A revamp resulting in the erosion of nations in favor of a globalized system of government (see below). A new world order, if you will.
A New World Order
The process of globalization has been written about before:
“As former Deputy Secretary of State under Clinton and Council on Foreign Relations member Strobe Talbot wrote in an article for Time Magazine in 1992 titled ‘America Abroad: The Birth Of The Global Nation’:
‘In the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority. National sovereignty wasn’t such a great idea after all.’
As elitist and Fabian Socialist HG Wells outlines in his non-fiction treatise titled The New World Order:
‘…Countless people … will hate the new world order … and will die protesting against it. When we attempt to evaluate its promise, we have to bear in mind the distress of a generation or so of malcontents, many of them quite gallant and graceful-looking people.’
…Trilateral Commission member Richard N. Gardner, former deputy assistant Secretary of State for International Organizations under Kennedy and Johnson:
‘…an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault.’”
Raise your hand if you think the world’s elite and global organizations collaborating to reset & reshape the world into a unified control system as they see fit will be good for you, your children, and your country. Do you want to live in a world re-imagined by MasterCard, BP, Microsoft, and the 1%? Do you think there will be a vote of the people to determine what gets changed, and how? Do most of the 1% view you as anything other than cattle? Will the ways they choose to change the world be to your benefit?
Based on the WEF’s articles and websites and an examination of current events, it sure seems like they’re just going to do whatever they want and tell us to eat it.
Control of Perception
If you don’t like it, maybe you’ll be given some chemical re-education?
“Moral enhancement is the use of substances to make you more moral. The psychoactive substances act on your ability to reason about what the right thing to do is, or your ability to be empathetic or altruistic or cooperative.”
“Another challenge is that the defectors who need moral enhancement are also the least likely to sign up for it. As some have argued, a solution would be to make moral enhancement compulsory or administer it secretly, perhaps via the water supply.”
“Morality pills.” Sounds like soma from Brave New World. If something bothers you, take this pill and it won’t anymore. What happened to governments serving the people? How did we arrive at such an Orwellian endgame that the government is not only attacking us with propaganda (see part 11), but some people are suggesting they actually drug us so we’ll go along with their orders? What country are we in, again?
If that’s not bad enough, look at the control that billionaires like Bill Gates can exert over the media via their “charitable foundations:”
“Twenty years ago, journalists scrutinized Bill Gates’s initial foray into philanthropy as a vehicle to enrich his software company, or a PR exercise to salvage his battered reputation following Microsoft’s bruising antitrust battle with the Department of Justice. Today, the foundation is most often the subject of soft profiles and glowing editorials describing its good works.
During the pandemic, news outlets have widely looked to Bill Gates as a public health expert on covid—even though Gates has no medical training and is not a public official. PolitiFact and USA Today (run by the Poynter Institute and Gannett, respectively—both of which have received funds from the Gates Foundation) have even used their fact-checking platforms to defend Gates from “false conspiracy theories” and “misinformation,” like the idea that the foundation has financial investments in companies developing covid vaccines and therapies. In fact, the foundation’s website and most recent tax forms clearly show investments in such companies, including Gilead and CureVac.
In the same way that the news media has given Gates an outsize voice in the pandemic, the foundation has long used its charitable giving to shape the public discourse on everything from global health to education to agriculture—a level of influence that has landed Bill Gates on Forbes’s list of the most powerful people in the world.“
https://www.cjr.org/criticism/gates-foundation-journalism-funding.php
This may be hard to believe for some, but just imagine the consequences if Bill Gates ISN’T a super nice guy. Maybe he’s actually a bad guy? Maybe he’s a nice guy who is wrong sometimes? Maybe he has good intentions but makes mistakes like everyone else? Maybe he’s nice but the successors who inherit his empire of influence and control aren’t? There’s way too much potential for abuse there, even if it’s accidental. No one person should have that much influence. Why do so many bow down to his opinion?